The graphical convergence monitor for the 40-fluid run
shown here
gives proof of a satisfactorily converging calculation;
and computer
times are seen to be small.
The results
The table shows how the number of fluids influences the predicted
rate of smoke production and the computer time.
number | smoke | seconds |
1 | 0.74 | 100 |
10 | 2.38 | 139 |
20 | 2.28 | 217 |
30 | 2.31 | 267 |
40 | 2.26 | 485 |
50 | 2.27 | 599 |
Note that:
- On this occasion MFM predicts more smoke production than
the conventional single-fluid model; and
- the 10-fluid model provides a good approximation.
The following figures show the computed PDFs for a location in the
middle of the outlet plane of the combustor, for
10 fluids,
40 fluids,
50 fluids.
The shapes are all similar; and the root-mean-square and
population-average values do not differ much.
The following contour plots show various aspects of the 50-fluid
calculation:
- The very different smoke distributions on an axial plane
according to:
(a) the single-fluid
(no fluctuations) model and
(b) the multi-fluid model
The flow is from right to left.
- The somewhat different distributions of population-average temperature
according to:
(a) the single-fluid model
and
(b) the multi-fluid model
The highest temperature encountered is (understandably) greater for the
single-fluid than for the multi-fluid model.
- The concentrations of fluids:
fluid 1, (pure air)
fluid 6, (fuel-lean) ,
and
fluid 11 (approximately stoichiometric).